Placement of a Continuous Stellate Ganglion Block for Treatment of Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation in the Setting of Known Prinzmetal Angina During Pregnancy: A Case Report.

A patient with a history of Prinzmetal angina, refractory ventricular fibrillation, cardiac arrest with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, and obesity presented to the emergency department at 17 weeks gestational age with a chief complaint of angina and multiple episodes of defibrillation. A T3/4 thoracic epidural was placed to assess the effectiveness of a partial chemical sympathectomy in alleviating symptoms of angina as well as decreasing the amount of defibrillation episodes. Once this proved to be beneficial in accomplishing both of these goals, a more specific approach was designed. A continuous stellate ganglion block was then placed controlling both her angina and preventing further episodes of defibrillation long enough for her pregnancy to progress beyond 24 weeks gestational age.

Novel Regional Techniques for Total Knee Arthroplasty Promote Reduced Hospital Length of Stay: An Analysis of 106 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Novel regional techniques, including the adductor canal block (ACB) and the local anesthetic infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) block, provide an alternative approach for controlling pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study compared 3 regional techniques (femoral nerve catheter [FNC] block alone, FNC block with IPACK, and ACB with IPACK) on pain scores, opioid consumption, performance during physical therapy, and hospital length of stay in patients undergoing TKA. METHODS: All patients had a continuous perineural infusion, either FNC block or ACB. Patients in the IPACK block groups also received a single injection 30-mL IPACK block of 0.25% ropivacaine. Pain scores and opioid consumption were recorded at postanesthesia care unit discharge and again at 8-hour intervals for 48 hours. Physical therapy performance was measured on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 2, and hospital length of stay was recorded. RESULTS: We found no significant differences in the 3 groups with regard to baseline patient demographics. Although we observed no differences in pain scores between the 3 groups, opioid consumption was significantly reduced in the FNC with IPACK group. Physical therapy performance was significantly better on POD 1 in the ACB with IPACK group compared to the other 2 groups. Hospital length of stay was significantly shorter in the ACB with IPACK group. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that an IPACK block reduced opioid consumption by providing effective supplemental analgesia following TKA compared to the FNC-only technique. ACB with IPACK provided equivalent analgesia and improved physical therapy performance, allowing earlier hospital discharge.

Distal Peripheral Nerve Blocks in the Forearm as an Alternative to Proximal Brachial Plexus Blockade in Patients Undergoing Hand Surgery: A Prospective and Randomized Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: Limited data exist regarding the role of perineural blockade of the distal median, ulnar, and radial nerves as a primary anesthetic in patients undergoing hand surgery. We conducted a prospective and randomized pilot study to compare these techniques to brachial plexus blocks as a primary anesthetic in this patient population. METHODS: Sixty patients scheduled for hand surgery were randomized to receive either an ultrasound-guided supraclavicular, infraclavicular, or axillary nerve block (brachial plexus blocks) or ultrasound-guided median, ulnar, and radial nerve blocks performed at the level of the mid to proximal forearm (forearm blocks). The ability to undergo surgery without analgesic or local anesthetic supplementation was the primary outcome. Block procedure times, postanesthesia care unit length of stay, instances of nausea/vomiting, and need for narcotic administration were also assessed. RESULTS: The 2 groups were similar in terms of the need for conversion to general anesthesia or analgesic or local anesthetic supplementation, with only 1 patient in the forearm block group and 2 in the brachial plexus block group requiring local anesthetic supplementation or conversion to general anesthesia. Similar durations in surgical and tourniquet times were also observed. Both groups reported similarly low numerical rating scale pain scores as well as the need for postoperative analgesic administration (2 patients in the forearm block group and 1 in the brachial plexus block group reported numerical rating scale pain scores > 0 and required opioid administration in the postanesthesia care unit). Block procedure characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Forearm blocks may be used as a primary anesthetic in patients undergoing hand surgery. Further research is warranted to determine the appropriateness of these techniques in patients undergoing surgery in the thumb or proximal to the hand. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic II.

Ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve blockade in the severely and morbidly obese: a prospective and randomized study.

PURPOSE: Limited research data exist regarding optimal block techniques in the severely and morbidly obese patient population. We compared two approaches to sciatic nerve blockade at the popliteal fossa in severely and morbidly obese patients. The purpose of this study was to identify differences in pain scores, block onset characteristics, and adverse events between the proximal (prebifurcation) and the distal (postbifurcation) sites. METHODS: Patients with a body mass index ≥35 scheduled for unilateral foot surgery with a popliteal block were randomized to receive an ultrasound-guided popliteal block proximal or distal to the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve. The primary endpoint was numerical rating scale (NRS) scores in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU). RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled in each group for a total of 60 participants. Patients in the distal group had lower NRS scores upon entry into the PACU (0.70 ± 1.91) compared with the proximal group (2.17 ± 3.37), had a faster onset of sensorimotor blockade, and were less likely to require a repeat block procedure, conversion to general anesthesia, or local anesthetic supplementation by the surgical team. There was no difference in block procedure times or incidence of nerve injury between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The distal approach to the popliteal block provided several intraoperative and analgesic benefits without a difference in block procedural times in the severely and morbidly obese. It is a cost-free intervention that results in a higher likelihood of a successful block in a population where avoidance of opioids is desirable.

The adductor canal block provides effective analgesia similar to a femoral nerve block in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty--a retrospective study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the ability of an ultrasound-guided single-shot adductor canal block to provide adequate analgesia and improve performance during physical therapy. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review. SETTING: All procedures were performed at Ochsner Medical Center. MEASUREMENTS: Patient demographics as well as the type of peripheral nerve block performed. Pain scores and opioid consumption were recorded at postanesthesia care unit discharge and again at 8 ± 3, 16 ± 3, and 24 ± 3 hours. In addition, physical therapy performance was analyzed. MAIN RESULTS: There were no significant differences in pain scores or cumulative hydromorphone requirements between the adductor canal block group and the femoral nerve block group at any of the time points analyzed. Gait distance measured during physical therapy sessions in the adductor canal block group was superior compared with the femoral nerve block group. CONCLUSION: Within the first 24 hours, a single-shot adductor canal block provides equally effective analgesia when compared with a femoral nerve block and improves postoperative physical therapy performance.

Perioperative analgesia for forequarter amputation in a child: a dual paravertebral approach.

We describe the management of postoperative pain for a 10-year-old girl who underwent forequarter amputation for osteosarcoma of the left humerus. Because the brachial plexus itself was divided and resected during surgery, and the main body part innervated by the nerves from this plexus (the entire upper limb including the scapula and clavicle) was removed, providing analgesia via a brachial plexus block alone would probably not have provided adequate coverage. Because the tissue not resected with this surgery was innervated via the cervical and brachial plexuses and some upper thoracic nerve roots, we elected to combine a perioperative high continuous cervical paravertebral block at the C5 level with a continuous thoracic paravertebral block at the T2 level for postoperative analgesia. Our patient experienced excellent postoperative analgesia and required no narcotics during the immediate postoperative period.

Paravertebral block: cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article outlines the new developments around all four types of paravertebral block: cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral. RECENT FINDINGS: It is emphasized that paravertebral blocks are all performed on the level of the roots of the nerves or plexuses, which are surrounded by dura mater extending from the dura mater surrounding the spinal cord. Because of this, they are all performed with essentially the same technique and they all have the same characteristics and problems associated with them, although they are called by many different names: 'cervical paravertebral' vs. 'posterior approach', 'psoas compartment' vs. 'lumbar plexus block' vs. 'lumbar paravertebral block', and so on. The knowledge that the roots are surrounded by dura and root level blocks are done just outside the dura should afford all paravertebral blocks the same respect as spinal epidural blocks because the potential of devastating complications such as intrathecal or intramedullary injection, for example, is shared. The advances in ultrasound and other novel approaches are described, yet the value of these has not been established. SUMMARY: We discuss commonality and differences between the four types of paravertebral blocks, and newer indications and concerns, especially pertaining to nerve microanatomical differences, are highlighted.